<body>

Friday, October 8, 2010

GOD AND US

Religion in the USA is the focus of this PBS series on American Experience's Frontline

Although I don't consider myself as a religious person, I was raised in a very religious family and environment. Very fundamentalist, very conservative and not encouraged to think for myself/ourselves...beyond what we were told is the truth. I don't fit in my family's plan for me. I am therefore a misfit, an outcast, a "disappointment" to what was expected of me and judgment from the members has always been present.

I approve of me. Although at times, I would prefer to feel like I fit in my family, it is necessary that it is enough that I am okay with who and what I am. Being a "member" has been secondary to living a life that is not pretentious and in my truth.

But, I am interested in learning why I am what I am and where I "came from". So this American Experience's Frontline series sounds interesting to me. I plan to watch it. It is always online if you miss it when it airs on TV.
............................................................

Watch the full episode. See more FRONTLINE.

............................................................

October 11 God in America: Episodes 1 & 2

October 12 God in America: Episodes 3 & 4

October 13 God in America: Episodes 5 & 6

Excerpts from the PBS website about God in America

...For the first time on television, God in America, a presentation of AMERICAN EXPERIENCE and FRONTLINE, will explore the historical role of religion in the public life of the United States. The six-hour series, which interweaves documentary footage, historical dramatization and interviews with religious historians, will air over three consecutive nights on PBS beginning Oct. 11, 2010....

..."The American story cannot be fully understood without understanding the country's religious history," says series executive producer Michael Sullivan. "By examining that history, God in America will offer viewers a fresh, revealing and challenging portrait of the country."...

..."Americans are awash in a sea of faith, but their knowledge about religious faiths and religious history often runs as shallow as their commitment to religion runs deep," notes Stephen Prothero, chief editorial consultant for God in America, professor of religion at Boston University, and author of Religious Literacy: What Every American Needs to Know -- And Doesn't. "A series like God in America can help correct that imbalance and provide the basis for a common understanding of the role religion has played in American public life."...

And this series will be airing again....

We Shall Remain

~ this is a "must see" about the people who lived here before the immigrants came and took their land and denied them to live their lives in the freedom they had before the government of the USA was formed

October 18 We Shall Remain: After the Mayflower

October 25 We Shall Remain: Tecumseh's Vision

November 1 We Shall Remain: Trail of Tears


Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES DESERVE ALL THE MONEY THEY CAN MAKE. RIGHT?

The title to the post is wrong. I don't believe the statement. It is irony.

I have always had serious issues with the wording in the Declaration of Independence. Specifically this excerpt:

The history of the present King of Great Britain [George III] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

* See below for text that goes here.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

The indigenous people had a right to protect their way of life. After all, it is felt today, that the United States has a right to protect their way of life by those who attacked the USA on September 11.

I believe the wording which calls the indigenous people "merciless Indian Savages" is full of prejudice, ignorance and racist. And here it is institutionalized in one of the most important documents - other than all those treaties the government signed with the indigenous peoples and broke one after another.

Ironic, that the following words are what is written between the above statements. Some of the very things that the Declaration of Independence is faulting King George of Great Britain of doing to the Europeans, who landed in North America, the Europeans were doing and worse to the indigenous people already inhabiting the land being taken or stolen by the Europeans.


* He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

The second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence begins:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life...

"...certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life". "Life" includes health care, health insurance. And yet, so much trouble around a health care bill that provides this right to life, even for those who can't afford insurance.

Source of Declaration of Independence:
www.law.indiana.edu/uslawdocs/declaration

................................................
................................................
Some irony in this video.

The pledge of allegiance to the USA flag, which there was such a flurry about during the Presidential campaign ends with the words "with liberty and justice for all". There were false claims at that time, that Barack Obama would not wear a patriotic flag pin or say the pledge of allegiance.

There is a lack of "justice for all", if not all can afford health care.


Furthermore....
................................................

................................................

I say it is racism.

Professor James Peterson puts it very well in this video.

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Saturday, August 15, 2009

GRASSROOTS EFFORTS STEPPING UP TO BE VOICE FOR DARFURIS

JUSTICE FIRST

PEACE WILL FOLLOW

AND ONLY THEN

Near the bottom of this post is an opportunity for you to sign an open letter to President Obama on behalf of justice for the Darfuri families.
Look for the gray text.
Thank you.

The letter posted below (which was faxed to U.S. Sudanese Special Envoy Gration) was the first news issue aired on Radio Dabanga in Sudan August 14, Friday, 2009. They read excerpts from the letter and aired part of the interview conducted with Mohamed Suleiman yesterday via phone. They repeated the section of the letter in four languages: Arabic, Fur language, Massalit language, and Zaghawa language.

This means that the entire Darfuri population in Darfur and in the Diaspora heard loudly and clearly that the grass roots movement in United States of America is deeply concerned by the way General Gration is handling the Darfur crisis.

The timing of the letter is very critical since many in Darfur think that Gration represents the policy of an elected President of the United States of America and hence, the opinion of the people of the United States of America.

The above information was received from Darfuri
Mohamed Suleiman who is living currently in San Francisco, California.


I am reposting the letter sent to U.S. Sudanese Special Envoy Scott Gration this week below. My name is second from the bottom - Sandra Hammel, Use Your Voice to Save Darfur RI.

The letter is available online at http://savedarfurma.org/2009.08.13.LettertoSpecialEnvoyGrati.pdf
The letter is available in Arabic online at http://savedarfurma.org/2009.08.13.ArabicLettertoSEGration.pdf

August 13, 2009

Major General J. Scott Gration (Retired)
Special Envoy to Sudan
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street, NW
Washington, DC 20520

cc: Office of President Barack Obama, Office of Vice President Joseph Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Senator John S. Kerry, Senator Richard G. Lugar, Representative Howard Berman, Representative Gary Ackerman, Undersecretary of Democracy and Global Affairs Maria Otero, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson

Dear Special Envoy Gration:

We write to you in response to your testimony before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on July 30, 2009. We appreciate your deep commitment to engaging all countries and parties concerned about peace for Sudan and your focus on working toward the successful implementation of the CPA. However, we are extremely concerned about key elements of your approach towards the continuing humanitarian crisis in Darfur and to the Government of Sudan (GoS).

We believe that your conciliatory stance and reluctance to criticize the GoS both excuses and emboldens the GoS thereby facilitating its ongoing reign of terror and well-known strategy of "divide and rule." Candidate Obama promised that if he became president he would "take immediate steps to end the genocide in Darfur by increasing pressure on the Sudanese and pressuring the government to halt the killing and stop impeding the deployment of a robust international force." We fear that your approach to Sudan is at odds with the President's promise and will quash the hopes of all Sudanese for justice, peace, and the end of the culture of impunity that has afflicted Sudan.

We implore you to consider the following aspects of your performance as Special Envoy which we consider problematic:

1. Failing to both acknowledge ongoing human rights violations by the GoS and consider these violations as another component of its genocidal campaign

2. Failing to acknowledge behavior by the GoS that demonstrates its lack of commitment to peace and justice

3. Failing to hold the GoS accountable for such aforesaid behavior

4. Failing to define and promote a strong sanctions policy

5. Downplaying Sudan as a "State Sponsor of Terror" and suggesting normalization of relations with the U.S.

6. Neglecting to adequately engage with or incorporate the priorities expressed by Darfuri civil society and the Darfuri Diaspora

These problems are elaborated below.

1. Failing to both acknowledge ongoing human rights violations by the GoS and consider these violations as another component of its genocidal campaign: Your public statements as Special Envoy have emphasized your hard work and progress in Sudan, but have glossed over the ongoing plight of Darfuris, particularly IDPs and refugees who struggle daily with conditions of despair, helplessness, and fear. In recent months, we have seen:

An ongoing campaign of intimidation of IDP leaders, including the arrest of thirteen IDP camp leaders between June 28 and August 9, and reports of torture and targeted assassinations

The March 2009 expulsion and confiscation of over $5 million in assets of 16 NGOs, which provided critical services to over one million IDPs

Continuing harassment, restrictions and delays of humanitarian operations for the NGOs still operating in Sudan

The installation of Sudanese NGOs linked to Khartoum who not only fail to provide adequate aid, but use relief services to blackmail or punish the IDP camp residents who criticize Bashir's administration

The GoS's failure to admit the four new aid organizations as agreed in mid-June

Continuing restrictions and delays to the implementation of the UNAMID forces

A Janjaweed attack on Kalma Camp in June 2009

The GoS sentencing more than 110 Darfuris to death after questionable trials,

The GoS censoring its media and arresting and detaining human rights activists in unknown locations

There are numerous other documented instances of human rights violations by the GoS during the past four months. However, there is scant, if any, evidence of actions by the GoS showing that it is sincerely interested in peace with Darfur, South Sudan or other marginalized Sudanese.

Furthermore, it is unacceptable that crimes such as those listed above are not considered genocidal merely because of a reduction in the number of violent, direct attacks carried out by the GoS since 2004-06. Current abuses are similar to those of the past, which are included in the State Department's reports on the Darfur genocide. Changing the nomenclature will send a signal of pardon to the GoS, damage our leverage in stopping the violence and perpetuate the impunity that has facilitated the suffering of the Darfuri civilians as a result of their own government's policies.

2. Failing to acknowledge behavior by the GoS that demonstrates its lack of commitment to peace and justice: The policies of the GoS against its people, whether in Darfur or South Sudan or other marginalized areas, have been deliberately established, well-entrenched, and ruthlessly pursued over decades. It is a mistake to believe that friendly talk will convince the GoS to change its policies. Indeed, it was only because of powerful multi-lateral and multi-dimensional pressures that the GoS agreed to the CPA, ending the 22 year conflict between the GoS and the South. The GoS has a longstanding record of making agreements, but not abiding by the agreements. Partial performance, delayed performance, and non-performance are common results of solemn commitments from the GoS. The CPA is a critically important example of all three performance types.

In Darfur, the GoS has frequently entered into ceasefire agreements and bombed Darfur within days. In February 2009, the GoS and JEM signed an agreement to take "good faith" measures to negotiate for peace; before the negotiations could resume, the GoS expelled the 16 humanitarian aid organizations. The UN Security Council has issued 30 resolutions regarding Sudan since 2003, several of them because the GoS violated previous UNSC resolutions. The UNSC first ordered disarming the Janjaweed in Resolution 1556 on July 30, 2004. The GoS repeatedly agreed to disarm the Janjaweed, but has made no efforts to do so.

The U.S. cannot assume that the GoS will keep its commitments. Instead, specific negative consequences for non-performance must be made clear and imposed if necessary.

3. Failing to hold the GoS accountable: You have spoken publicly of incentives for the GoS, but avoid talk of or planning for increased pressure. Given the long history of crimes against humanity by the GoS, the ongoing human rights violations, and the ICC warrants for the arrest of senior members of the GoS, U.S. policy must not simply ignore history and start "fresh" with the GoS with "no preconceptions." U.S. policy must be tough-minded, and define specific benchmarks for significant improvements by the GoS if it wishes to avoid substantial new pressures being applied, let alone pressures being relieved.

4. Failing to define and promote a strong sanctions policy: We welcomed your recent self-correction, published on August 10 in your "This I Believe" statement on Sudan, in which you state that sanctions against the Government of Sudan should not be lifted now. We are glad that you agree that the products and services needed for development in South Sudan should be enabled by administration of appropriate exceptions rather than by lifting economic sanctions on the GoS.

The SPLM Secretary General, Pa'gan Amum Okiech, in his recent House testimony, gave an excellent framework for lifting sanctions:

"...the lifting of sanctions should be linked to the full implementation of the CPA and to the resolution of the conflict in Darfur and any steps by the United States Government towards that end should be conditioned on the achievement of specific actions and concrete steps in building peace and transition to democracy. The following, among others, can be identified as concrete steps forward - the demarcation of borders; the adoption of the referendum law and a National Security Act that respects freedoms; the lifting of press censorship; the institution of a transparent oil sector; the implementation of the PCA decision of Abyei, and the achievement of a monitored Ceasefire in Darfur."

We look forward to seeing you adopt a similarly strong sanctions policy, which should include imposing additional punitive measures if the GoS continues human rights abuses or fails to meet its obligations to peace, justice, and safety of its citizens.

5. Downplaying Sudan as a "State Sponsor of Terror" and normalization of relations with U.S.: We were deeply troubled by your assertion that there is "no evidence" to support that Sudan is a state sponsor of terror. Although the facts may be classified regarding exactly what assistance Khartoum has provided to the U.S. in the war against terror, it is public knowledge, reflected in Department of State reports on terrorism that weapons from Iran intended for Hamas travel through Sudan. In March 2009, Sudan acknowledged a January 2009 aerial attack on a convoy near the Sudan border with Egypt. Furthermore, Chadian rebel forces supported by the GoS have repeatedly attacked Chadian government officials and property as well as civilians. These are obvious examples that Sudan is a state sponsor of international terrorism, as defined by U.S. law.

Furthermore, apart from the evidence that Sudan is a state sponsor of international terrorism, normalization of relations with the GoS is incompatible with the fact that the GoS continues to support wide-spread abuses that meet the definition of terrorism against millions of its own people.

6. Neglecting to adequately engage with or incorporate the priorities expressed by Darfuri civil society and the Darfuri Diaspora: We respectfully request that you take into account the priorities and problems expressed by Darfuri civilians in IDP and refugee camps and in the Diaspora.

In particular, note their clear and consistent desires:

For justice and the end of the culture of impunity in Sudan,

For safety and protection, the prerequisites for IDPs and refugees to be able to return to their home villages, and

For strong pressures to be brought to bear on the GoS,

Darfuris are eager to engage with you and have reached out in a variety of ways. Communications from Darfuris are sent in various forms daily to the Sudan Desk at the Department of State. IDP camp leaders met with the African Union Panel on Darfur in June and their requests are public knowledge. Letters from Darfuri expatriates in the U.S. were delivered to the White House and State Department on July 22. Please, take advantage of these opportunities and take additional steps to reach out and engage with Dafuris.

We thank you for your hard work to help resolve the many complex conflicts in Sudan. We believe the root cause is the oppression and marginalization of the majority of the people by the minority NCP party which is intent on remaining in power by any means. Our hope is that the suggestions in this letter will be valuable in the difficult work ahead to bring to fruition the goal of peace in Darfur and all of Sudan.

Very truly yours,

Americans Against the Darfur Genocide Nikki Serapio,
Director San Francisco, CA

Buddhist Peace Fellowship
Zenju Earthlyn Manuel,
Executive Director Oakland, CA

CANDLES Holocaust Museum and Education Center
Kiel Majewski,
Museum Coordinator Terre Haute, Indiana

Colorado Coalition for Genocide Awareness and Action
Roz Duman, Founder/Director
Denver, Colorado

Damanga Coalition for Freedom and Democracy
Mohamed Yahya, Founder/ Executive Director
Washington, DC

Darfur Alert Coalition
Kat Harrison, Executive Director
Philadelphia, PA

Darfur and Beyond
Cory Williams, Co-Founder
Phoenix, Arizona

Darfur Leaders Network Ibrahim
Hamid, President

Darfur People's Association of New York
Motasim Adam, Director
Brooklyn, New York

Darfur Reconciliation and Development
Adeeb Yousif, Founder & Chairperson
Zalingei ,West Darfur, Sudan

Darfur Renaissance
Ismail Omer, Executive Director Dallas,
Texas

Darfur Urgent Action Coalition of Georgia
Melanie Nelkin, Chair
Atlanta, Georgia

Dear Sudan, Love Marin
Gerri Miller, Founder
Tiburon, California

Defend Darfur Dallas
Laura McCarthy, Director
Dallas, Texas

Eunice Malath
Miss South Sudan 2009/2010
Omaha, Nebraska

Fur Cultural Revival
Mansour Ahmed, President
Portland, Maine

Genocide No More--Save Darfur
Marv Steinberg, Coordinator
Redding, California

Headwaters Relief Organization
Angela Thomley, Program Administrator
Minneapolis, MN
i-ACT
Katie-Jay Scott, Director
Los Angeles, California

Idaho Darfur Coalition
Younis Haroun, Leading Darfuri Member
Boise, Idaho

Investors Against Genocide
Eric Cohen, Chairperson
Boston, Massachusetts

Jewish World Watch
Tzivia Schwartz-Getzug, Executive Director
Los Angeles, California

Kentuckiana Interfaith Taskforce On Darfur
Bob Brousseau, Chair and Founder
Louisville, Kentucky

Massachusetts Coalition to Save Darfur
Susan Morgan, Director of Communications
Boston, Massachusetts

Mia Farrow Sudan Advocate, Actor

New York City Coalition for Darfur
Sharon Silber, Co-founder
New York, New York New York

Darfur Vigil Group
Helga Moor, Founder
New York, New York


San Antonio Interfaith Darfur Coalition
Susan Smylie, SAIDC Advocacy Coordinator
San Antonio,Texas

San Francisco Bay Area Darfur Coalition
Martina Knee, Member, Executive Committee
San Francisco, California

Shine A Ray of Hope for Darfur
Carmen Paolercio, Coordinator
New Rochelle, New York

South Sudan Institute for Women’s Education and Leadership (SSIWEL)
Sunday Taabu Wani, Chair of the Board Greensboro,
North Carolina

Stanford STAND
Angie McPhaul, Coordinator Stanford,
CA

Stop Genocide Now
Gabriel Stauring, Director Los Angeles,
California

Sudan Unlimited
Esther Sprague, Founder
San Francisco, CA

Use Your Voice to Save Darfur
Sandra Hammel, Director
Providence, Rhode Island

Voices for Sudan
White Joshua Walla, Founding Member
Washington, DC


Press Release about the above letter:

OPEN LETTER SENT TO SUDAN SPECIAL ENVOY SCOTT GRATION BY SUDAN ADVOCATES FROM THE US, DARFURI DIASPORA, AND SOUTHERN SUDAN
Signatories fear Gration's approach will quash hopes of Sudanese for justice, peace, and an end to the culture of impunity afflicting Sudan

CITIES NATIONWIDE - August 13, 2009 - Today Darfur activists from around the country, joined by actress Mia Farrow, organizations representing the Darfuri Diaspora, and organizations representing Southern Sudanese, sent an open letter to Retired Major General J. Scott Gration. The letter was written in response to the Special Envoy's testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on July 30, 2009 and outlines concerns about key elements of the Special Envoy's approach towards the continuing humanitarian crisis in Darfur and to the Government of Sudan. Copies were also sent to key decision makers in the Administration and on Capitol Hill, and a translated version has been disseminated to foreign media outlets. (Full text of letter and list of signatories are below.)

The letter states, "We believe that your conciliatory stance and reluctance to criticize the GoS both excuses and emboldens the GoS thereby facilitating its ongoing reign of terror and well-known strategy of 'divide and rule.' Candidate Obama promised that if he became president he would 'take immediate steps to end the genocide in Darfur by increasing pressure on the Sudanese and pressuring the government to halt the killing and stop impeding the deployment of a robust international force.' We fear that your approach to Sudan is at odds with the President's promise and will quash the hopes of all Sudanese for justice, peace, and the end of the culture of impunity that has afflicted Sudan."

The letter continues:

"We implore you to consider the following aspects of your performance as Special Envoy which we consider problematic:

1. Failing to both acknowledge ongoing human rights violations by the GoS and consider these violations as another component of its genocidal campaign
2. Failing to acknowledge behavior by the GoS that demonstrates its lack of commitment to peace and justice
3. Failing to hold the GoS accountable for such aforesaid behavior
4. Failing to define and promote a strong sanctions policy
5. Downplaying Sudan as a "State Sponsor of Terror" and suggesting normalization of relations with the U.S.

6. Neglecting to adequately engage with or incorporate the priorities expressed by Darfuri civil society and the Darfuri Diaspora."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you want to help, there is another letter that we need signatures for. It is an open letter to President Obama.

South Sudan Women's Empowerment Network (SSWEN) and Voices for Sudan (both Sudanese led organizations) urge you to sign this important letter to President Obama.
Please click here to read and sign the letter.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Write President Obama
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

You can also call or write to the President:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Comments to President Obama:
202-456-1111
or
1-800-GENOCIDE

The White House comment line is available
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. weekdays

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Call the USA Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
202-647-6575

The USA State Department public comment line
7 days a week, 24 hours a day
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Find USA elected politicians contact information at this link:
http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml



JUSTICE FIRST

PEACE WILL FOLLOW

AND ONLY THEN

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Thursday, August 13, 2009

PRESIDENT AL-BASHIR INTERVIEWED IN KHARTOUM AIRED on JIM LEHRER NEWS HOUR AUGUST 13, 2009


Interview by
Sam Dealey

Link to Time Magazine article and additional links:
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1916107,00.html


PRESS RELEASE - August 13, 2009

OPEN LETTER SENT TO SUDAN SPECIAL ENVOY SCOTT GRATION BY SUDAN ADVOCATES FROM THE US, DARFURI DIASPORA, AND SOUTHERN SUDAN
Signatories fear Gration's approach will quash hopes of Sudanese for justice, peace, and an end to the culture of impunity afflicting Sudan

CITIES NATIONWIDE - August 13, 2009 - Today Darfur activists from around the country, joined by actress Mia Farrow, organizations representing the Darfuri Diaspora, and organizations representing Southern Sudanese, sent an open letter to Retired Major General J. Scott Gration. The letter was written in response to the Special Envoy's testimony before the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on July 30, 2009 and outlines concerns about key elements of the Special Envoy's approach towards the continuing humanitarian crisis in Darfur and to the Government of Sudan. Copies were also sent to key decision makers in the Administration and on Capitol Hill, and a translated version has been disseminated to foreign media outlets. (Full text of letter and list of signatories are below.)

The letter states, "We believe that your conciliatory stance and reluctance to criticize the GoS both excuses and emboldens the GoS thereby facilitating its ongoing reign of terror and well-known strategy of 'divide and rule.' Candidate Obama promised that if he became president he would 'take immediate steps to end the genocide in Darfur by increasing pressure on the Sudanese and pressuring the government to halt the killing and stop impeding the deployment of a robust international force.' We fear that your approach to Sudan is at odds with the President's promise and will quash the hopes of all Sudanese for justice, peace, and the end of the culture of impunity that has afflicted Sudan."

The letter continues:

"We implore you to consider the following aspects of your performance as Special Envoy which we consider problematic:

1. Failing to both acknowledge ongoing human rights violations by the GoS and consider these violations as another component of its genocidal campaign
2. Failing to acknowledge behavior by the GoS that demonstrates its lack of commitment to peace and justice
3. Failing to hold the GoS accountable for such aforesaid behavior
4. Failing to define and promote a strong sanctions policy
5. Downplaying Sudan as a "State Sponsor of Terror" and suggesting normalization of relations with the U.S.

6. Neglecting to adequately engage with or incorporate the priorities expressed by Darfuri civil society and the Darfuri Diaspora."

The letter is available online at http://savedarfurma.org/2009.08.13.LettertoSpecialEnvoyGrati.pdf
The letter is available in Arabic online at http://savedarfurma.org/2009.08.13.ArabicLettertoSEGration.pdf


Here is the letter's text, but without the signatories listed, for that, click on the link above. My name is on Page 5, second from the bottom - Use Your Voice to Save Darfur RI.

August 13, 2009

Major General J. Scott Gration (Retired)
Special Envoy to Sudan
U.S. Department of State
2201 C Street, NW
Washington, DC 20520

cc: Office of President Barack Obama, Office of Vice President Joseph Biden, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Senator John S. Kerry, Senator Richard G. Lugar, Representative Howard Berman, Representative Gary Ackerman, Undersecretary of Democracy and Global Affairs Maria Otero, Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs Johnnie Carson

Dear Special Envoy Gration:

We write to you in response to your testimony before the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations on July 30, 2009. We appreciate your deep commitment to engaging all countries and parties concerned about peace for Sudan and your focus on working toward the successful implementation of the CPA. However, we are extremely concerned about key elements of your approach towards the continuing humanitarian crisis in Darfur and to the Government of Sudan (GoS).

We believe that your conciliatory stance and reluctance to criticize the GoS both excuses and emboldens the GoS thereby facilitating its ongoing reign of terror and well-known strategy of "divide and rule." Candidate Obama promised that if he became president he would "take immediate steps to end the genocide in Darfur by increasing pressure on the Sudanese and pressuring the government to halt the killing and stop impeding the deployment of a robust international force." We fear that your approach to Sudan is at odds with the President's promise and will quash the hopes of all Sudanese for justice, peace, and the end of the culture of impunity that has afflicted Sudan.

We implore you to consider the following aspects of your performance as Special Envoy which we consider problematic:

1. Failing to both acknowledge ongoing human rights violations by the GoS and consider these violations as another component of its genocidal campaign

2. Failing to acknowledge behavior by the GoS that demonstrates its lack of commitment to peace and justice

3. Failing to hold the GoS accountable for such aforesaid behavior

4. Failing to define and promote a strong sanctions policy

5. Downplaying Sudan as a "State Sponsor of Terror" and suggesting normalization of relations with the U.S.

6. Neglecting to adequately engage with or incorporate the priorities expressed by Darfuri civil society and the Darfuri Diaspora

These problems are elaborated below.

1. Failing to both acknowledge ongoing human rights violations by the GoS and consider these violations as another component of its genocidal campaign: Your public statements as Special Envoy have emphasized your hard work and progress in Sudan, but have glossed over the ongoing plight of Darfuris, particularly IDPs and refugees who struggle daily with conditions of despair, helplessness, and fear. In recent months, we have seen:

An ongoing campaign of intimidation of IDP leaders, including the arrest of thirteen IDP camp leaders between June 28 and August 9, and reports of torture and targeted assassinations

The March 2009 expulsion and confiscation of over $5 million in assets of 16 NGOs, which provided critical services to over one million IDPs

Continuing harassment, restrictions and delays of humanitarian operations for the NGOs still operating in Sudan

The installation of Sudanese NGOs linked to Khartoum who not only fail to provide adequate aid, but use relief services to blackmail or punish the IDP camp residents who criticize Bashir's administration

The GoS's failure to admit the four new aid organizations as agreed in mid-June

Continuing restrictions and delays to the implementation of the UNAMID forces

A Janjaweed attack on Kalma Camp in June 2009

The GoS sentencing more than 110 Darfuris to death after questionable trials,

The GoS censoring its media and arresting and detaining human rights activists in unknown locations

There are numerous other documented instances of human rights violations by the GoS during the past four months. However, there is scant, if any, evidence of actions by the GoS showing that it is sincerely interested in peace with Darfur, South Sudan or other marginalized Sudanese.

Furthermore, it is unacceptable that crimes such as those listed above are not considered genocidal merely because of a reduction in the number of violent, direct attacks carried out by the GoS since 2004-06. Current abuses are similar to those of the past, which are included in the State Department's reports on the Darfur genocide. Changing the nomenclature will send a signal of pardon to the GoS, damage our leverage in stopping the violence and perpetuate the impunity that has facilitated the suffering of the Darfuri civilians as a result of their own government's policies.

2. Failing to acknowledge behavior by the GoS that demonstrates its lack of commitment to peace and justice: The policies of the GoS against its people, whether in Darfur or South Sudan or other marginalized areas, have been deliberately established, well-entrenched, and ruthlessly pursued over decades. It is a mistake to believe that friendly talk will convince the GoS to change its policies. Indeed, it was only because of powerful multi-lateral and multi-dimensional pressures that the GoS agreed to the CPA, ending the 22 year conflict between the GoS and the South. The GoS has a longstanding record of making agreements, but not abiding by the agreements. Partial performance, delayed performance, and non-performance are common results of solemn commitments from the GoS. The CPA is a critically important example of all three performance types.

In Darfur, the GoS has frequently entered into ceasefire agreements and bombed Darfur within days. In February 2009, the GoS and JEM signed an agreement to take "good faith" measures to negotiate for peace; before the negotiations could resume, the GoS expelled the 16 humanitarian aid organizations. The UN Security Council has issued 30 resolutions regarding Sudan since 2003, several of them because the GoS violated previous UNSC resolutions. The UNSC first ordered disarming the Janjaweed in Resolution 1556 on July 30, 2004. The GoS repeatedly agreed to disarm the Janjaweed, but has made no efforts to do so.

The U.S. cannot assume that the GoS will keep its commitments. Instead, specific negative consequences for non-performance must be made clear and imposed if necessary.

3. Failing to hold the GoS accountable: You have spoken publicly of incentives for the GoS, but avoid talk of or planning for increased pressure. Given the long history of crimes against humanity by the GoS, the ongoing human rights violations, and the ICC warrants for the arrest of senior members of the GoS, U.S. policy must not simply ignore history and start "fresh" with the GoS with "no preconceptions." U.S. policy must be tough-minded, and define specific benchmarks for significant improvements by the GoS if it wishes to avoid substantial new pressures being applied, let alone pressures being relieved.

4. Failing to define and promote a strong sanctions policy: We welcomed your recent self-correction, published on August 10 in your "This I Believe" statement on Sudan, in which you state that sanctions against the Government of Sudan should not be lifted now. We are glad that you agree that the products and services needed for development in South Sudan should be enabled by administration of appropriate exceptions rather than by lifting economic sanctions on the GoS.

The SPLM Secretary General, Pa'gan Amum Okiech, in his recent House testimony, gave an excellent framework for lifting sanctions:

"...the lifting of sanctions should be linked to the full implementation of the CPA and to the resolution of the conflict in Darfur and any steps by the United States Government towards that end should be conditioned on the achievement of specific actions and concrete steps in building peace and transition to democracy. The following, among others, can be identified as concrete steps forward - the demarcation of borders; the adoption of the referendum law and a National Security Act that respects freedoms; the lifting of press censorship; the institution of a transparent oil sector; the implementation of the PCA decision of Abyei, and the achievement of a monitored Ceasefire in Darfur."

We look forward to seeing you adopt a similarly strong sanctions policy, which should include imposing additional punitive measures if the GoS continues human rights abuses or fails to meet its obligations to peace, justice, and safety of its citizens.

5. Downplaying Sudan as a "State Sponsor of Terror" and normalization of relations with U.S.: We were deeply troubled by your assertion that there is "no evidence" to support that Sudan is a state sponsor of terror. Although the facts may be classified regarding exactly what assistance Khartoum has provided to the U.S. in the war against terror, it is public knowledge, reflected in Department of State reports on terrorism that weapons from Iran intended for Hamas travel through Sudan. In March 2009, Sudan acknowledged a January 2009 aerial attack on a convoy near the Sudan border with Egypt. Furthermore, Chadian rebel forces supported by the GoS have repeatedly attacked Chadian government officials and property as well as civilians. These are obvious examples that Sudan is a state sponsor of international terrorism, as defined by U.S. law.

Furthermore, apart from the evidence that Sudan is a state sponsor of international terrorism, normalization of relations with the GoS is incompatible with the fact that the GoS continues to support wide-spread abuses that meet the definition of terrorism against millions of its own people.

6. Neglecting to adequately engage with or incorporate the priorities expressed by Darfuri civil society and the Darfuri Diaspora: We respectfully request that you take into account the priorities and problems expressed by Darfuri civilians in IDP and refugee camps and in the Diaspora.

In particular, note their clear and consistent desires:

For justice and the end of the culture of impunity in Sudan,

For safety and protection, the prerequisites for IDPs and refugees to be able to return to their home villages, and

For strong pressures to be brought to bear on the GoS,

Darfuris are eager to engage with you and have reached out in a variety of ways. Communications from Darfuris are sent in various forms daily to the Sudan Desk at the Department of State. IDP camp leaders met with the African Union Panel on Darfur in June and their requests are public knowledge. Letters from Darfuri expatriates in the U.S. were delivered to the White House and State Department on July 22. Please, take advantage of these opportunities and take additional steps to reach out and engage with Dafuris.

We thank you for your hard work to help resolve the many complex conflicts in Sudan. We believe the root cause is the oppression and marginalization of the majority of the people by the minority NCP party which is intent on remaining in power by any means. Our hope is that the suggestions in this letter will be valuable in the difficult work ahead to bring to fruition the goal of peace in Darfur and all of Sudan.

Very truly yours,

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

President al-Bashir interviewed in Khartoum by TIME Magazine.

See http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1916107,00.html

The interview will be on PBS on the Jim Lehrer News Hour tonight 6:00 pm EDT.

From PBS:

Sudan's Bashir Addresses Criminal Court Charges, Country's Woes
Time magazine's Sam Dealey and Sudan's President Omar al-BashirSudanese President Omar al-Bashir spoke with Time magazine's Sam Dealey in early August about the International Criminal Court's warrant for his arrest, the fighting in his country and relations with the U.S. Find an extended transcript of their conversation here.


Omar al-Bashir: Sudan's Wanted Man Talks to Time [Time]


Head of Save Darfur Gives His Take on Sudan's Leadership


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Write President Obama
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

You can also call or write to the President:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Comments to President Obama:
202-456-1111
or
1-800-GENOCIDE

The White House comment line is available
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. weekdays

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Call the USA Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
202-647-6575

The USA State Department public comment line
7 daent of Sudan, GRATION, homosexual, ICC, ilovemylife, Indians, Indigenous, Moreno-Ocampo, Native Americans, Nazis, Obama, Refugee Leaders, Sandra Hammel, Sudan, Tortureys a week, 24 hours a day
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Find USA elected politicians contact information at this link:
http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml



JUSTICE FIRST

PEACE WILL FOLLOW

AND ONLY THEN

Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

GENOCIDE BY ANY NAME IS STILL GENOCIDE AND ITS PERPETRATORS ARE TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

WHO ME? A CRIMINAL? DID I DO SOMETHING WRONG?
Fictitious questions attributed to Omar al-Bashir

hate: intense hostility and aversion usually deriving from fear, anger, or sense of injury

On December 9, 1948, in the shadow of the Holocaust, the United Nations approved the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. This convention establishes "genocide” as an international crime, which signatory nations “undertake to prevent and punish.” It defines genocide as:

Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In 1996 Gregory Stanton the president of Genocide Watch presented a briefing paper called "The 8 Stages of Genocide" at the United States Department of State. In it he suggested that genocide develops in eight stages that are "predictable but not inexorable".

The Stanton paper was presented at the State Department, shortly after the Rwanda genocide and much of the analysis is based on why that genocide occurred. The preventative measures suggested, given the original target audience, were those that the United States could implement directly or use their influence on other governments to have implemented.

Stage
Characteristics
Preventive measures

1.
Classification
People are divided into "us and them".
"The main preventive measure at this early stage is to develop universalistic institutions that transcend... divisions."

2.
Symbolization
"When combined with hatred, symbols may be forced upon unwilling members of pariah groups..."
"To combat symbolization, hate symbols can be legally forbidden as can hate speech".

3.
Dehumanization
"One group denies the humanity of the other group. Members of it are equated with animals, vermin, insects or diseases."
"Local and international leaders should condemn the use of hate speech and make it culturally unacceptable. Leaders who incite genocide should be banned from international travel and have their foreign finances frozen."

4.
Organization
"Genocide is always organized... Special army units or militias are often trained and armed..."
"The U.N. should impose arms embargoes on governments and citizens of countries involved in genocidal massacres, and create commissions to investigate violations"

5.
Polarization
"Hate groups broadcast polarizing propaganda..."
"Prevention may mean security protection for moderate leaders or assistance to human rights groups...Coups d’état by extremists should be opposed by international sanctions."

6.
Preparation
"Victims are identified and separated out because of their ethnic or religious identity..."
"At this stage, a Genocide Emergency must be declared. ..."

7.
Extermination
"It is "extermination" to the killers because they do not believe their victims to be fully human."
"At this stage, only rapid and overwhelming armed intervention can stop genocide. Real safe areas or refugee escape corridors should be established with heavily armed international protection."

8.
Denial
"The perpetrators... deny that they committed any crimes..."
"The response to denial is punishment by an international tribunal or national courts."

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is genocide in Sudan.

What may look to US Special Envoy Gration as less active genocide, is a method of passive genocide - GENOCIDE BY STARVATION, DEHYDRATION AND DISEASES.

Genocide by any name is genocide.

Genocide by starvation, diseases and other "passive" means - has been done before. It was done on the North American continent to the indigenous people.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/weshallremain/

Now - alongside active means - it is being done to the Darfuris.



The words "Never Again" are meaningless without deliberate acts to prevent or stop genocide when we know it is going on.

And we know it is going on in Sudan.

Since 2003.

President Obama said when he selected Scott Gration as Special Envoy to Sudan, that he was the one for the job. Gration and Obama don't agree at this point that what is going on in Sudan is systematic scheming to exterminate the Darfuris. To succeed, they need to agree on the basics, such as what is going on by the Government of Sudan. This discrepancy is a recipe for a failed legacy for our new President. We just had a President who left office with a failed legacy on Darfur.

"Change will not come if we wait for some other person or some other time. We are the ones we've been waiting for. We are the change that we seek." Barack Obama

So, let's make a change regarding what can be done about the Darfuris, President Obama.

And let us start with replacing Scott Gration as the U.S. Special Envoy to Sudan.

Darfuri men in refugee camp Djabal said on Fathers Day, that there will be no peace without justice.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We Are All the Keepers of Justice.

In Sudan, there is an emergency.

Silence kills in its complicity to killing by treachery.

Meningitis is spreading through Darfur IDP camps.
Now more than ever immunization is needed in all camps.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Write President Obama
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

You can also call or write to the President:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Comments to President Obama:
202-456-1111
or
1-800-GENOCIDE

The White House comment line is available
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. weekdays

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Call the USA Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
202-647-6575

The USA State Department public comment line
7 days a week, 24 hours a day
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Find USA elected politicians contact information at this link:
http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml


JUSTICE FIRST

PEACE WILL FOLLOW

AND ONLY THEN


Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

ONLY PEOPLE WHO FEEL SMALL NEED TO ACT BIG - IT'S A CASE OF CRAZY-MAKING ROOTED IN FEAR


BIGOTS IN USA OUT OF THE CLOSET

Hatred never begets calm, dignity
or you looking good while embodying it
...


The behavior being paraded at the so-named Town Hall meetings on health care, so that they will be aired and re-aired ad nauseam on Youtube, television and other platforms is all about being a sham.

That is the nature of who we have become....watching a train wreck, until we want to cry



out

STOP.

It isn't health care or their claim that Obama is going to make the USA a socialist country that bothers them and gets them off their chairs to go out and scream and carry racist placards. It isn't that they claim Barack Obama is not a USA citizen.

I realize that I am putting them all in a stereotypical category. But it doesn't take much to scratch the surface and get at the truth.

Listen to them try to make sense of their position. It loses integrity quickly. Catch the words, mind the tenor of their fear.

Do they care about anyone but themselves? Proof that they care about no one but themselves is witnessed by how they express their claimed cause. They can only do it while being rude, aggressive and while defaming.

Not one of them has made a point with rational thoughts. Not one of them has been civil. Even a bigot well-dressed or educated in a fine university is just a bigot. A reasonable person can be civil while being opposed to an idea. The public display of their behavior undermines that anyone should listen to them for long.

I heard one on Hardball Tuesday night, who thought everyone in Portsmouth, New Hampshire - where he had a loaded gun when President Obama was answering health care questions - would be safer if EVERYone there carried a loaded gun.

It is bigots who are mad the USA has a President who they feel so threatened by - that they will do what it takes to cause anything he is trying to do fail.

The real cause behind their madness comes from the fear they have that if Barack Obama is seen as a successful President, we will have more people in government with darker skin than theirs.

This scares them so much that they are emboldened by their fears to bare their flaws.

I, too, am in opposition to President Obama. My issue is the Darfur crisis. Health care for all is not a crime. And it will not bring down the country.

Are we going to allow mad, non-sensical men and women choose our agenda?

Remember Richard Nixon and the phrase he invented: "the silent majority"? I am thinking there are those about this issue. And I believe the whole purpose to the "crazy-making" behavior of these "citizens" is to keep the others who may be for "health care for all" from having a chance to ask a question. Read about "crazy-making" here: http://www.angelfire.com/vt/rcwn/Pagefortyone.html

Another man I heard Tuesday night on television said that some of these rude people voted for Barack Obama. That is boldercrap.

That's the problem - they lost the election and now are looking for ways to derail the one who won.

All because they are weak people who won't tolerate or accept someone they perceive as lower than them due to skin_color

A bigot doesn't admit to his or her own bigotry because to do so they would feel diminished. And they already feel small. Only people who feel small need to act big.

Hatred never begets calm, dignity
or you looking good while embodying it
...


JUMP

Hate shows up in town halls or where no one is watching.

Shortly after midnight on October 7, 1998, 21-year-old Shepard met McKinney and Henderson in a bar. McKinney and Henderson offered Shepard a ride in their car. Subsequently, Shepard was robbed, pistol whipped, tortured, tied to a fence in a remote, rural area, and left to die. McKinney and Henderson also found out his address and intended to rob his home. Still tied to the fence, Shepard was discovered eighteen hours later by Aaron Kreifels, who at first thought that Shepard was a scarecrow. At the time of discovery, Shepard was still alive, but in a coma.

Shepard suffered a fracture from the back of his head to the front of his right ear. He had severe brain stem damage, which affected his body's ability to regulate heart rate, body temperaturevital signs. There were also about a dozen small lacerations around his head, face and neck. His injuries were deemed too severe for doctors to operate. Shepard never regained consciousness and remained on full life support. As he lay in intensive care, candlelight vigils were held by the people of Laramie.

He was pronounced dead at 12:53 A.M. on October 12, 1998, at Poudre Valley Hospital in Fort Collins.Police arrested McKinney and Henderson shortly thereafter, finding the bloody gun as well as the victim's shoes and wallet in their truck.

The two men had attempted to get their girlfriends to provide alibis.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard
.....................................................

.....................................................
Matthew Shephard
Uploaded by ekirent

Hatred never begets calm, dignity
or you looking good while embodying it
...
.....................................................

.....................................................
Uploaded by TheEllenDegeneresSho


Hatred never begets calm, dignity
or you looking good while embodying it
...

.....................................................

.....................................................
Uploaded by kandy00345

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

We Are All the Keepers of Justice.

In Sudan, there is an emergency.

Silence kills in its complicity to killing by treachery.

Meningitis is spreading through Darfur IDP camps.
Now more than ever immunization is needed in all camps.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Write President Obama
http://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/

You can also call or write to the President:
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500

Comments to President Obama:
202-456-1111
or
1-800-GENOCIDE

The White House comment line is available
9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. weekdays

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Call the USA Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
202-647-6575

The USA State Department public comment line
7 days a week, 24 hours a day
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Find USA elected politicians contact information at this link:
http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml





Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,