OIL IN THE GULF, RAFA NADAL, SUDAN, DARFUR NEWS, LETTER TO OBAMA, TV SERIES TO FILM IN RHODE ISLAND JULY 2010
That last statement sounds like just something to say....you know like when we say "Never again" at the end of every genocide we acknowledge has happened. We never mean it.
IN THIS POST
* Oil Weighing Down Wildlife
* National Geographic - Gulf Oil Disaster - Are birds better off dead?
* More Gulf Oil Spill Coverage »
* Rafael Nadal - Very nice interview with Rafa
* Oil in the Gulf - June 11, 2010
* SUDAN - Live Webcast June 16, 2010, 4:00 p.m. USA EDT
* Darfur News
* Letter to Obama that I signed with other groups
* World Refugee Day - June 20, 2010
* South Carolina candidate Alvin Greene
* BP in charge of what it shouldn't be in charge of
* TV Show - Body of Proof being filmed entirely in Rhode Island
* Watching America
* Is the US learning the oil spill lesson?
* Report from Pravda, Russia America's Chernobyl
* National Geographic - Oil in the Gulf of Mexico Pictures
* Click the post title to AlJazeeraEnglish looks at what engineers are facing in trying to stem the flow of oil. Dated May 1, 2010
Here goes.....
Oil Weighing Down Wildlife
Photograph by Win McNamee, Getty Images
Shouldering the weight of heavy oil spewed from the Gulf of Mexico's Deepwater Horizon oil spill, a brown pelican struggles in sludgy surf on East Grand Terre Island, Louisiana, Friday.
Nearly 800 dead birds, sea turtles, dolphins, and other animals have been found in the Gulf and on its shores, according to federal authorities cited by the Associated Press. But the real story may be the rate at which animals are being affected by oil, which appears to have accelerated drastically in recent days.
Since opening six weeks ago—around the time the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded, initiating the Gulf oil spill—the Fort Jackson Oiled Wildlife Rehabilitation Center in Louisiana has treated 203 oiled birds, more than half of them in the last four days alone, USA Today reported.
(See"Gulf Oil Spill Worst in U.S. History.")
Published June 8, 2010
Oil-Coated Gulf Birds Better Off Dead?
Kill or clean? Either way, the birds may face stormy skies.
Source: Nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/06/100608-gulf-oil-spill-birds-science-environment/Published June 9, 2010
Since late last week a flood of pictures of oil-coated Gulf of Mexico birds—and conservationists painstakingly cleaning them—has added new emotional impact to the BP oil spill.
Some experts—citing traditionally low survival rates for rescued birds—are controversially arguing it would be better to immediately and humanely kill the suffering birds.
In a Spiegel Online article last month, German biologist Silvia Gaus argued that workers helping birds caught in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill, should "kill, not clean." Gaus said studies show that more than 99 percent of rehabilitated birds will die anyway as a result of oil exposure, mainly due to kidney and liver damage caused by oil ingestion.
Each oil spill is different, however, and survival rates often depend on factors such as climate and species, according to Nils Warnock, a wildlife specialist with the Oiled Wildlife Care Network at the University of California, Davis.
No one knows what the survival rate will be for the Gulf species affected by the oil spill. But, Warnock said, "I don't believe that all these birds that are being rehabilitated for the Deepwater Horizon spill will end up dying."
He added that Gaus's statistics are related to past North Sea oil spills, where birds are more prone to freezing after oil has compromised their natural waterproofing.
Conducted in the 1980s and 1990s, the studies also represent an "old paradigm" of bird rehabilitation, Warnock said. More recent work contradicts their conclusions of poor survival rates, he added.
For instance, a January 2009 study published in the African Journal of Marine Science said that only 27 percent of oil-rescued penguins had been unable to breed following their release—a relatively low rate.
And other recent studies found that, in the United States, 40 to 60 percent of some species of rehabilitated birds had survived after release, thanks to improved treatment, according to Roger Helm, chief of environmental quality for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS).
Over the years, rehabilitators have learned—mostly from trial and error—how better to care for injured birds, which is particularly important for rare species, Helm added.
But biologist J.V. Remsen is skeptical of the higher survival rates, at least in the context of the Gulf oil spill. That's because the birds may have ingested toxic oil before they ever reach a rescue center.
"If the rehabbers can convince me that 25-50 percent are going to be successfully cleaned and released back into the environment and not die subsequently and painfully from the oil they have ingested, then OK, let's give it a try," said Remsen, ornithologist and professor at the Louisiana State Department of Biological Sciences in Baton Rouge.
But, he said, "emotionally painful as it is, I would be for euthanizing those birds if it can be shown that the probability of them being successfully rehabbed is low."
As of Monday, 594 dead oiled birds and 413 live ones have been collected along the Gulf Coast since the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded on April 20, according to the joint federal-industry response team.
Thirty-nine birds have been released back into the wild, some of them to Florida's Pelican Island National Wildlife Refuge, which is currently outside of the oil's trajectory, according to the National Audubon Society.
Emotional Case for Rehabbing Oiled Birds
Of course, the decision to kill or clean is tough to make on mathematics alone.
"The public demands that something be done," the Oiled Wildlife Care Network's Warnock said. "It's heart-wrenching—you see this totally oil-covered animal. The only way you can see that they're alive is that their little eye blinks. That kills me every time."
Added USFWS' Helm, "We have responsibility for the birds, so we make the choice to do rehabilitation."
Saving even a few birds of rare species can make a real difference, said David Mizejewski, a naturalist at the Virginia-based National Wildlife Federation, a conservation nonprofit.
For instance, in the case of the brown pelican—a Gulf native only recently taken off the U.S. endangered species list—"every individual counts," Mizejewski said.
Gulf Oil Toxic to Birds
Oil harms birds in two ways: internally and externally.
Oil-soaked birds vigorously preen their feathers to remove the toxic crude, accidentally ingesting it, which can cause internal ailments.
"Try removing crude oil from your arm with your mouth and not getting any of it into your body," Louisiana State's Remsen said.
"How much damage has already been done [by the time the bird is rescued]? That's the big unknown in all of this rehabilitation."
Externally, oil degrades the birds' waterproofing oils, allowing cold water to touch skin and making the animals vulnerable to hypothermia, especially in cold regions, the Oiled Wildlife Care Network's Warnock said. "It's like surfing in the Northern Pacific—if your wet suit gets a hole, you're going to be cold fast."
Fortunately many of the hard-hit Gulf species, such as brown pelicans and laughing gulls, don't spend much time at sea, making their waterproofing less critical, Warnock pointed out. (Gulf Oil Spill Pictures: Ten Animals at Risk.)
But addressing the external effects is still an especially tricky task right now in the Gulf.
For instance, the Deepwater Horizon crude is especially sticky, which requires workers to clean the birds with more "intense" detergent, which in turn strips more of the birds' waterproofing oils, according to USFWS' Helm.
Conservationists have to wait weeks or even months for the birds' waterproofing to be naturally replenished, further stressing the animals and reducing space for incoming patients, Helm said.
Rescued Birds' Homing Instincts May Backfire
When a bird is rehabilitated, finding locations to release the animal so it won't get re-oiled is "problematic," Helm added.
That's why rehabilitators tend to choose oil-free habitats far away, Louisiana State's Remsen said. Yet many seabirds are "notorious for exceptional homing abilities, even over completely unfamiliar territory and vast distances.
"Many bird biologists would wager that the released birds would head right back where they came from, back into harm's way, especially during breeding season," Remsen said.
There's also the possibility that the birds won't adjust to their new homes, noted the National Wildlife Federation's Mizejewski. "If you're moved 500 miles [about 800 kilometers] away, even if you're following your instincts, you don't know the topography or where to look for food."
There's "no easy solution to clean up this mess," Mizejewski added. "We can't just take a few birds and put them in dish detergent and say we fixed the problem.
"It's a tragic, real example, in our face, [of the fact] that this problem is going to be with us for decad................................................................
Rafael Nadal BBC Interview - after Rd 1 at The Queens Club
June 11, 2010
Uploaded by thisroomsforsquares
Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
Please note: This event will be webcast live beginning at 4:00pm EDT on June 16, 2010 at www.usip.org/webcast.html.
A Critical Moment in Sudan: Views from President Thabo Mbeki and SRSG Haile Menkerios
Co-sponsored by the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the U.S. Institute of Peace
With seven months until the referendum in Sudan to determine whether or not the south remains part of a united Sudan, coupled with the recent increase of violence in Darfur, the country remains volatile and its future uncertain. The United States and the international community - particularly the African Union and the United Nations - remain deeply involved in the implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement and the preparations for the referendum. As the countdown to this all-important vote begins, the Africa Program of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and the United States Institute of Peace are jointly hosting a discussion with two key leaders of the international effort to manage this difficult process in Sudan: former South African President Thabo Mbeki, now head of the African Union High Level Implementation Panel (Sudan), and Haile Menkerios, the special representative of the U.N. secretary-general in Sudan and head of the United Nations Mission in Sudan. They will discuss the current situation in Sudan and international efforts to achieve peace and ensure a smooth referendum process.
With:
Darfur In the News
Reuters: ICC seeks UN council aid on Sudan arrests. The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court said on Thursday that he will ask the U.N. Security Council this week to order Sudan to hand over two men indicted for war crimes in Darfur. "What we need now is to declare that the Security Council will ensure their arrest," ICC chief prosecutor Luis Moreno-Ocampo told Reuters.Reuters: Sudan retires general sanctioned over Darfur. Sudan's president replaced the top leadership of his armed forces, the army said late Thursday, including removing one senior officer facing U.S. sanctions for his alleged role in the Darfur conflict. Sudan's army spokesman told Reuters the move was nothing to do with politics but was part of an annual review of senior posts, promoting officers to replace commanders who had reached retirement age. President Omar Hassan al-Bashir removed five generals, including the deputy chairman of the joint chiefs of staff of the armed services General Mohammed Ahmed Awad Ibn Auf, blacklisted by Washington for his role as the army's head of military intelligence and security during the Darfur conflict. Auf is included on Washington's list of Specially Designated Nationals which freezes any of their assets in the States and blocks U.S. nationals from doing business with them.
Sudan Tribune: Civil society call for independent referendum commission. With Sudan's long-awaited referendum just months away, civil society members under the 'Southern Sudan Civil Society Referendum Taskforce' are already advocating for the formation of an independent referendum commission. "This civil society referendum taskforce will serve as a think tank for information sharing, analysis and dissemination. It will also act as an advocacy group that will promote the needs of the population prior to the forthcoming referendum," a member told this reporter yesterday.
The following op-ed by George Clooney and John Prendergast was featured in USA Today: U.S. must help stop Sudan's slow-motion war. "The largest conventional war on the face of the earth in 2011 will occur in Sudan unless bold diplomacy led by the U.S. prevents it. The most dangerous tripwire will be in seven months, when southern Sudanese will vote to determine whether the South splits off and forms a new country. Some ruling party officials don't want to give up the oil-rich South without a fight. Southerners spilled a great deal of blood to win the right to opt out of Sudan, and they will keep fighting until they have their own state [...] The good news is that this path to all-out war is unfolding in slow motion, and there is time to prevent it. The U.S. has a history of leading international efforts in Sudan, including helping to broker the 2005 peace deal. But the Obama administration has not taken a direct, leading role in the negotiations to avert renewed war in the South or to end the Darfur conflict. Furthermore, some U.S. officials believe that the United States has no leverage in Sudan. U.S. officials can break out of this box and build leverage in support of peace by presenting a Door 1 vs. Door 2 scenario, in which good outcomes would result from peace, and serious consequences would be triggered by war. Parallel carrots and sticks are the key to this approach."
The following piece by John Prendergast was featured in The Huffington Post in response to reactions to his above op-ed: The Value of Sticks AND Carrots. "Some strong reactions to the op-ed I wrote with George Clooney yesterday, published in USA Today, prompt me to follow up with some additional thoughts that we weren't able to convey in a 600 word article. In the piece, we wrote:
'On the carrots side, the U.S. should present a quid pro quo with an expiration date by the end of the year: In exchange for peace in Darfur and the South, the U.S. would move to normalize relations with Sudan and work in the U.N. Security Council to suspend the war crimes indictment of President Omar Hassan al-Bashir under Article 16 of the International Criminal Court charter. On the sticks side, a U.S.-led initiative should build international support for severe consequences for anyone promoting war, whether they are ruling party officials, militias, rebels, or southern Sudan's leaders.'
This in no way diminishes my (or Enough's) belief that - in light of the pattern of Sudan's ruling National Congress Party to renege on its written agreements and work behind-the-scenes to undermine peace - multilateral sticks remain the greatest tool with which to promote policy and behavior change on the part of the NCP. Promoting parallel carrots is required to increase the chances of being heard by Obama administration officials and allies who do not respond to a sticks-only message, and to increase the odds that the NCP will actually alter its behavior in favor of peace if there is a real prospect of achieving some of its foreign policy goals with respect to its relations with the rest of the world."
My signature is second from the last in the above letter.
...............................................................
World Refugee Day
June 20, 2010
twitter.com/refugees
see the embed images at http://www.refugeedaylive.org/share.html
There's been something noticeably absent from the media coverage of the oil spill. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has tallied hundreds of dead birds, sea turtles, and dolphins drenched with oil. But where are the photos?
The reason you're not seeing many is because BP doesn't want you to. They've barred workers from sharing photos of oiled wildlife and, according to locals, have been whisking away dead and injured wildlife to buildings and offshore ships.
For animal lovers, one of the most heartbreaking aspects of the Gulf spill is the oil-drenched wildlife washing up on shore. If you're too horrified to look at any photos, you're in luck — BP doesn't want you to see them.
BP Tries to Block Photos of Dead Wildlife
As of Friday morning, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s tally of dead animals collected in the Gulf area was 527 birds, 235 sea turtles (six to nine times the average rate), and 30 mammals, including dolphins. Yesterday morning, the spill washed over Queen Bess Island (called “Bird Island” by locals), which is a habitat for Louisiana brown pelicans, the state bird that was once an endangered species. Forty-one of the birds were coated with oil, and that number is expected to rise.
Have you seen the terrible pictures of all this carnage? Neither have I. And neither has anyone else.
Wonder why? The New York Daily News reported on Wednesday that BP has ordered its contractors not to share pictures or otherwise publicize the scores of dead and injured wildlife.
Labels: ACT NOW FOR DARFUR, Birds, Louisiana, National Geographic, President Barack Obama, Rafael Nadal, Rhode Island, Sandra Hammel ilovemylife, Sudan, The Price of Oil in Blood, World Refugee Day
posted by ilovemylife @ 1:51 AM
0 Comments
