“When it is obvious that the goals cannot be reached, don't adjust the goals, adjust the action steps.” Confucius
When pundits tell you what something means, it is just their opinion, their guess and possibly not really what something means. When Hillary Clinton tells you that since she “won” Ohio, she should be the Democratic candidate ~ it is just words. Because “winning” in the Democratic Caucus and Primary season means getting the most points when counting delegates. “Winning” a state really means nothing more than perception. For example, Barack Obama “lost” New Hampshire, but Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama received the exact same number of delegates from New Hampshire.
Obama Versus Clinton Results Center
Pundits say the darndest things
Things I have heard pundits say that are not true:
1. Hillary won Michigan. No, she di’nt. She was the only Democrat candidate on the ballot. But the Democratic National Committee’s rules said Michigan was not going to count.
2. Hillary won Texas. This was said and the caucus vote in Texas still isn’t stated by the state of Texas. It isn’t even mandated to be in until Friday, March 7, 2008. Hillary won the Texas Primary vote by 3 per centage points, not 4 as I heard CNN state tonight. But Texas had both a Primary and a Caucus.
Hillary says the darndest things
Hillary has said that she should be the candidate because she has won the important states. That means that all of us are not equal in her thinking. She claims that she has proven that she can win in the “important” states this November because she won them in the Primary and Caucus season. The fact is Barack Obama will win those very same states when running against John McCain. So her rationale means nothing in this regard.
Hillary says Caucus state wins are not important. It is very possible that is because she has lost in the Caucus states to Barack Obama.
“Hillary rules” are convenient rules for Hillary. Whatever happens, Hillary devises the rules AFTER what just happened.
Hillary claims the press is harder on her. Not so. No one has brought up Vince Foster's death
Here is another link.
Hillary Clinton Gets More of a Pass Than Is Being Admitted
No one has delved into Bill and Hillary’s history by the Obama campaign.
Personally, I didn’t pay attention to the Clinton scandals and gave them a “pass” when he was in office. But now, that Hillary is running I have an interest in whether or not I should know more about Hillary.
Another Clinton scandal link page.
...................................................................
...................................................................
...................................................................
Hillary finally acknowledges a loss....Barack Obama's ....just never her own.
WHEN HILLARY SPEAKS MY SKIN CRAWLS
It’s a reaction. I also have a tendency to gag. My intuition has always been extremely reliable for me. This physical reaction tells me a lot. And it isn’t good about Hillary Clinton.
Hillary claims she always gets asked the first question in the debates. But as President, when the “red phone” rings in that “commercial political ad” she would probably be the “first” one to answer it, wouldn’t she?
There is something in Hillary’s body language that I have been paying attention to in this campaign. And I don’t like what I see. I don’t like how she has intentionally let stories go from her campaign and then she gets a “pass” from “inquiring minds” because she says “as far as I know”. Well, a good leader who is running a campaign and wants to show experience, good judgment and integrity would find out and wouldn’t have to say “as far as I know” so many times. It is suspicious at best. Surely she should know that it was a staff person in her campaign that leaked the picture of Barack in traditional dress because the intent was to play into people’s ignorance and fear of the unknown in hopes that people would hold it against Barack Obama. Surely a leader would lead her campaign’s spokespeople in how they should conduct themselves. But repeatedly she has not only allowed stories to go for enough days to do their intended damage before she says some form of “well, he currently doesn’t work for my campaign” or “as far as I know”. She should know. If she doesn’t, she lacks the good judgment of a good, experienced-toting leader.
She says her Health Care Plan includes ALL and that is why she is better. I got the mailer from her in RI where she bad-mouths Barack’s plan because she claims it doesn’t include ALL. But her campaign has been run to only include Americans in states that vote for her. All the states that Barack Obama has won she has said are not important and don’t matter. She claims disdainfully that her husband didn’t win the Caucus states either, so she discounts those people who are a part of ALL. The ALL she says she cares enough about to include in her Health Care Plan. Just not in counting their votes as important to get elected.
When the rules are not in Hillary’s favor, she twists and turns WORDS to make it fit her game.
Isn’t that the very same game with a different name that we have EXPERIENCED for the last 7 years? The name being that of George W Bush?
George W Bush told us that when he “beat” John Kerry, he had a mandate of the whole country to do what he wanted. Not really. A mandate would have to have included a country that had a huge per centage of the people turn out to vote, have their votes justly counted and then that still wouldn’t be enough. The President would have had to serve the people by being open by coming to us with his different plans and policies and persuading us that his plans and policies were in our best interest. But instead he has done everything behind closed doors and misused the Constitution and abused our trust.
Here is a Republican Agenda
Republicans are rooting for Hillary because she energizes their base for their purposes and some of them are voting for her since John McCain has the Republican nominee and they can help elect Hillary to better set up the race they want in November.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We the People must be the overseers of our elected politicians. Even Thomas Jefferson, a slave master, said the following:
“If once the people become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, Judges and Governors, shall all become wolves. It seems to be the law of our general nature, in spite of individual exceptions.”
OBAMA FOR PRESIDENT
No comments:
Post a Comment